Acquiring the User Adoption Cycle: How OpenAI Plans to Reduce Technical Jerk with Statsig

A theme keeps coming up in our conversations with engineering leaders lately. They describe their process for deploying new LLMs and it sounds like how we used to treat monolith releases ten years ago, and it’s terrifying. This invokes a feeling of moving at incredible speed but without the right guardrails. And so it was no surprise when OpenAI acquired Statsig–It wasn’t just another acquisition, it was a profound signal.

Progressive Delivery is not just an optional nice-to-have; it’s a requirement for the increasing acceleration of technological change. Or as we call it technical jerk. It’s about moving beyond the painful, unpredictable “big bang” releases and embracing a more controlled, data-driven approach to deploying new features. Think: rolling out changes gradually, targeting specific user segments, and continuously learning from real-world usage before committing to a full rollout. It’s about confidence, control, and constant iteration.

Now, why is this more critical than ever in the age of AI? Because AI isn’t just another feature; it’s often the core intelligence of our applications, a complex, often opaque system. And with intelligence comes nuance, unpredictable user interactions, and a constant, urgent need for refinement.

The OpenAI-Statsig Acquisition: A Masterclass in Progressive AI Delivery

For those of us who’ve been advocating for smarter release strategies, OpenAI’s acquisition of Statsig was a massive validation. It wasn’t just a strategic acquisition, it was a clear signal that even the pioneers of AI–companies operating at the absolute cutting edge–understand the critical importance of a robust, data-driven platform for experimentation and gradual rollout.

Why would OpenAI, at the forefront of AI innovation, need Statsig? Because building AI is fundamentally about iteration and learning at speed and scale. You don’t just “ship” an LLM and call it a day. You:

Let’s be clear, the stakes with AI are fundamentally different. A bug in a traditional web feature might result in a 404 error or a broken UI element. A “bug” in an AI model could lead to public relations disasters from biased outputs, staggering unforeseen cloud compute bills from inefficient prompts, or even a total breakdown of user trust. Progressive Delivery is no longer just a “best practice” for reducing deployment risk; for AI, it’s an essential governance, cost-control, and brand-protection mechanism.

Imagine trying to launch a new, more powerful version of ChatGPT without the ability to progressively roll it out and test it in the wild, measuring not just performance, but cost and safety? The potential for unexpected behavior, performance dips, security vulnerabilities, or even ethical missteps would be immense. Statsig provides the guardrails and the data feedback loop essential for this.

Progressive Delivery: The AI Developer’s Superpower

In an AI-first world Progressive Delivery isn’t just a nice-to-have, it’s the competitive differentiator.

The OpenAI-Statsig acquisition is more than a business deal, it’s a blueprint for the future of AI development. It shows us that even the most advanced AI organizations recognize that intelligent development isn’t just about building groundbreaking models, but about delivering them progressively, learning continuously, and ensuring a robust, cost-effective, and user-centric experience.

So, as you dive deeper into the world of AI, remember the lessons of Progressive Delivery. It will help you move from incredible AI ideas to truly impactful, resilient, and continuously evolving AI products. Don’t let your AI strategy be incomplete.

What are your thoughts? How are you applying Progressive Delivery principles to your AI initiatives? Let us know in the comments!

NEWSLETTER

Get the latest updates in your inbox.